We proceed now to a precise consideration of the matters described above.
It is understood that each product
is performed
with the operation of
. It is now a straight-forward
matter to show that, for this operation, the associative
law is satisfied. Also the element
, where
is the identity
element of
, functions as the identity element of
.
Finally, the inverse of the element
is the element
Hence
is a group
with respect to the given operation. It is also
clear that the following is true.
Now we consider the following situation; which will subsequently be shown to be related.
For the time being, we shall write in parenthesis
after an expression of the form
either
``external'' or ``internal'' to distinguish which of the two
situations defined above actually prevails. After we have
seen the inter-connection between these two concepts,
it will be clear that we can drop this accompanying label
without fear of confusion.
Our first theorem related to direct products is
concerned with the latter situation, i.e., where
is the
internal direct product of its subgroups,
. We have
(1)
for any
and any
where
, and
(2) Every element of
can be written uniquely
in the form
where
.
Proof:
Suppose first that
(internal), and let
and
where
. Then
the commutator
since
(since
), and
.
However,
and
(since
).
Therefore
, but
(WHY?). Hence
Conversely suppose that (1) and (2) hold.
We claim each
. Indeed, for if
and
,
is an
arbitrary element of
, then
Proof:
Let
be an isomorphism of
onto
. We now define a mapping
We claim that
is an isomorphism of
onto
.
First
we observe that
is onto
: For any element
in
,
we know is of the form
, where
.
Therefore, since each
is onto, there exist
so that
, and so
Second, we note that
is a homomorphism,
i.e.,
preserves the group operation.
For
Lastly, to prove our claim, we must show that
is 1-1.
To see this, suppose
that
, i.e.,
.
Then
,
which by the uniqueness of representation,
Theorem 9.1.5, implies that
,
for all
,
. Since each
is 1-1, Theorem 7.1.6 implies that
for all
,
, where
is the
identity of
. Therefore
is the identity of
, i.e.,
is trivial. Thus
Theorem 7.1.6 implies that
is 1-1, which proves
our claim (that
is an isomorphism).
We note, in particular, taking
,
,
in Theorem 9.1.5 that if
(internal), then forming
(external) gives a group isomorphic to
.
Proof:
Clearly each
(Why?) and the
mapping
given by
is
also clearly an isomorphism of
onto
. Moreover,
From now on, we drop writing in parentheses after
an expression
either
``external'' or ``internal''.
It should be clear from the context what is meant.